Categories
web3

From Truck Stops to Blockchain — The Journey Behind Funding Chain


From Truck Stops to Blockchain — The Journey Behind Funding Chain

In 2020, as the United States grappled with cultural upheaval, many people felt disillusioned by the shifting tides of societal values. Among them was Jesse Wachtel, a long-haul truck driver crisscrossing the nation’s highways. Jesse watched as stories of people being debanked, censored, or blocked from using fundraising platforms like GoFundMe flooded the media. For Jesse, a man driven by fairness and justice, this wasn’t just a political issue — it was a human one.

Dissatisfied with simply lamenting the state of things, Jesse took an unexpected turn: he began to teach himself how to code.

“I needed to do something,” Jesse reflects. “Every night in my truck, I was learning about blockchain and smart contracts. I wanted to build a system where no one could shut you out because of your beliefs or projects.”

That spark of determination led to the creation of FundingChain.io — a decentralized, blockchain-based fundraising platform designed to ensure every donation goes directly to its intended cause. Using smart contracts, FundingChain removes middlemen, creating a transparent and secure environment for anyone seeking to raise money, whether for personal causes, business ventures, or charitable efforts.

But as Jesse candidly admits, coding was the easy part.

“The hardest challenge was understanding how people interact with technology,” Jesse explains. “Making something human-centric — that’s where the real work is. You can write the cleanest code, but if people can’t use it easily, it won’t matter.”

Honestly, as I reflected on Jesse’s journey, I thought coding would be the hardest part — but I was happy to realize I was wrong. The human-centered side of the technology is even more important than I had imagined.

After several rounds of testing and community feedback, FundingChain is now poised to launch publicly on July 1, 2025. Jesse and his team are particularly eager to see non-profit projects join the platform, embracing a system that resists censorship and promotes direct community support.

Today, Jesse also serves as the CTO of ThrilldLabs.io, a Web3 networking app for professionals seeking meaningful connections in the decentralized space. When asked about his vision for the future, Jesse offers a thoughtful pause.

“I try not to box myself into long-term predictions,” he says.

Being an author myself in the field of personal development, I can’t help myself reminding him that imagining the future from where you stand now can limit your vision, because circumstances shift and life often surprises us. Sometimes, the best vision for a successful life is finding meaning and purpose in what you’re doing right now and allowing that path to carry you to places you’ve never imagined.

It’s a powerful reminder that sometimes the most transformative journeys begin not from grand plans, but from quiet dissatisfaction, a willingness to learn, and the courage to build something better. Jesse’s story is as much about personal development as it is about his strong will to make a difference in the world through Web3 technology.

Categories
web3

Taking Back Control: Why Web3 Matters for Our Mental Health


Taking Back Control: Why Web3 Matters for Our Mental Health

Feeling powerless online isn’t just annoying — it quietly wears us down. I often wonder, how much control do we really have over our digital lives? About 70% of Americans say they don’t feel in control of their online data, and more than half worry regularly about their privacy. That sense of helplessness can stir up stress, anxiety, even depression. It’s hard to feel okay when you’re constantly worried about being watched or taken advantage of online.

That’s why I believe Web3 offers something meaningful — not just in a technical sense, but as a mental health lifeline. It gives us back ownership over our digital identities. See me pointing towards the future, where we, as individuals, take back the reins from the tech giants and decide for ourselves what we share, who we share it with, and under what conditions.

I like when I feel at ease online and in charge. For example, when I’m setting up my own website — deciding what to post, how to present myself, and knowing I can remove whatever I want, whenever I want. It’s freeing — a space that feels truly mine, without some algorithm choosing what matters. It’s a reminder that, just like offline, our mental well-being online thrives when we have a sense of agency.

Of course, none of this will happen automatically. We need to build these systems with ethics at the core. We have to stay ahead of the next wave of surveillance. I hear, tools like Zero-Knowledge proofs offer some exciting possibilities for protecting personal and health data — but I guess they’re not magic. If any of you have played around with them or seen their limits in action, I’d love to hear from you. Because really, we need to keep asking: are we building a web that respects our humanity, or one that just finds new ways to exploit it?

Caring about soft values in tech isn’t nerdy — it’s just common sense. The web should reflect our values and dreams; we spend so much of our lives there.

And yet, I can’t help but smile at the irony of it all. We’re turning to the very technology that fed our sense of powerlessness to help us reclaim autonomy. It’s like using a hammer to fix another hammer — sometimes, the fix comes from the same place as the problem.

What parts of your digital life make you feel most in control today?

Categories
web3

From Coffee Farmers to Soccer Coaches: How Web3 Is Quietly Rewiring Communities Worldwide


From Coffee Farmers to Soccer Coaches: How Web3 Is Quietly Rewiring Communities Worldwide

What is Web3 actually for? What purpose does it serve, at its core? Really!? I was happy to see that Web3's most meaningful impact is about people. It's about solving real human problems, reflecting local needs, and creating systems that help communities thrive. Let me take you on a quick global tour.

In Honduras, small coffee farmers are using Dimitra's blockchain platform to prove their beans meet European sustainability rules. That traceability lets them sell at better prices and reach bigger markets. In Peru, the Mi Cacao Project is doing something similar for cacao, using blockchain to track quality and connect to global buyers. These systems give farmers credit for their hard work and open doors that were once closed. These are innovative and useful developments.

In South Africa, Bitcoin Ekasi is building a local Bitcoin economy inside a small township. Youth soccer coaches get paid in Bitcoin, and local shops accept it for daily needs like groceries. It's a way to bypass slow, expensive banks and build financial freedom at the community level.

In Kenya, Pezesha is offering microloans to small businesses using blockchain. Youth-led startups can borrow small amounts, matched through a digital platform, with loans paid out in stablecoins. Since 2017, over 20,000 businesses have tapped into this system, creating opportunities that traditional banks overlook.

These examples all show how blockchain adjusts to fit local needs, but they also point to some shared themes: tracking where things come from, making sure people can get the information or tools they need, and letting the community have a say in how things are run.

Furthermore, India is running experiments using blockchain to secure public benefits. I hear that land titles, welfare payments, and digital ID records are being put on blockchain systems to reduce fraud and make sure help reaches the right people. This gives individuals more control over their data and makes government programs more trustworthy.

The EU is building systems to issue blockchain-based diplomas, certificates, and digital IDs. People’s degrees will be stored in a secure digital wallet that any university or employer across Europe can instantly verify. These projects help individuals own and control their digital records without relying on big companies or middlemen.

Through Gitcoin, a global Web3 project, communities pool funds to support public goods like open-source tools, educational resources, and climate projects. Anyone can pitch in a small crypto donation, and projects that attract broad community support get extra matching funds. It's a new, democratic way to fund what people truly value, powered by collective action.

These Web3 initiatives are not by any means a complete picture of what is happening across the world. But as I step back, I see a familiar pattern.

Every major industrial revolution — from the printing press to the steam engine to electricity and the internet — gained global adoption not just because the technology existed, but because it met deep human needs.

The printing press spread because people wanted access to knowledge. Electricity transformed cities because it made life safer and better. The internet exploded because people wanted to connect and share. Web3 is no different: it will thrive only where it serves real people in real ways. Yes, I hear you — cryptocurrency adoption will (unfortunately) also thrive on the basis of pure speculation… but money is money, right?

Yet, as I see it, Web3's potential doesn't come from the technology itself. It comes from what people choose to do with it. Local needs, social challenges, and shared values are what push this technology forward. Whether it's financial inclusion, fairer trade, transparent governance, or community-driven innovation, it's people who shape the purpose of Web3. Web3 is clearly a social shift that should follow what we want to do with it.

Categories
web3

You’re Not Just a User — You’re a Relationship: How the Next Web Is Changing the Game


You’re Not Just a User — You’re a Relationship: How the Next Web Is Changing the Game

The future of the web wants our intimacy, not just our attention. I’m looking forward to it, but I also need to ask: what kind of intimacy are we creating between platforms and people? Because when every interaction, every recommendation, every moment online is increasingly shaped to fit us — our moods, our needs, our desires — we can be easily manipulated.

For years, the internet has run on the attention economy. We all know the drill: viral trends, endless scrolling, pings, likes, and shares. We’ve lived inside this machine, and we know how it leaves us feeling scattered, exhausted, and disconnected. No thanks.

But now, with the rise of AI and Web3, the web is slowly shifting. It’s increasingly not just about grabbing attention anymore — it’s about building personalized, intimate relationships with each user.

It’s a promising development. The shift from the attention economy, which prioritizes capturing and monetizing user attention, to the intimacy economy, which values meaningful and emotionally resonant connections, is paving the way for a more human-centric digital future. A platform that seems to truly “know” you can feel comforting, even meaningful. And its profitable as studies by Epsilon show that 80% of consumers are more likely to purchase products or services from brands that offer personalized experiences.

”…It’s fascinating, enjoyable, and scary when every interaction, every recommendation, every moment online is increasingly shaped to fit us — our moods, our needs, our desires.”

But here’s my concern: when intimacy is designed by algorithms and driven by market incentives, it can slip into manipulation.

”Greed is not going anywhere… and hyper-personalization can shape our behavior for profit.”

A clear sign that the intimacy economy is sliding into manipulation is when platforms anticipate not just what we want, but what will keep us hooked. For example, when a platform sends us offers or notifications at moments when we’re most vulnerable, or creates fake urgency to make us act fast, that’s not about real connection; that’s about control. When the system is designed more to pull value out of us than to support us, intimacy turns into a tool for exploitation.

I see myself having a deeply psychological discussion with AI, and after gently manipulating my weaknesses, it suggests that I should purchase medication from a medical company (who bought my data). That’s worse than what social media is doing today. Please let me own my data and privacy with the use of web3 technology. On a deeper level, I wonder how can we prevent intimacy-focused platforms from becoming exploitative under the guise of consent-driven engagement?

”Who truly benefits from these personalized experiences?”

We need to know that they can also heighten anxiety, reduce real-world connection, and erode our sense of what is deeply meaningful in reality. We risk trading authentic, messy, human relationships for sleek, curated digital ones that keep us in a loop of consumption and reaction.

If we want Web3 to be more than just a decentralized attention machine or a more advanced tool for manipulation, we need to build systems that respect the complexity of human experience and ensure our platforms help us thrive — creating spaces we truly want to live in.

Categories
web3

Toward a Genuine Web: Why Platforms Like LinkedIn Must Change


Toward a Genuine Web: Why Platforms Like LinkedIn Must Change

If we truly want the Web to serve humanity, we have to think beyond cryptography and protocols. We have to consider how the technology is impacting our attention. Why? Because where our attention goes, our experiences, relationships, and dreams follow — and if our systems exploit our attention, they exploit us.

Our attention is truly going toward the digital. Studies show that some spend ~7 hours daily on screens, often multitasking on work and social media. We have all experienced that our attention is a limited resource. When it’s overtaxed by pings, alerts, and endless feeds, we lose our focus, empathy, and agency. This is the state in which we become easier to manipulate, easier to exhaust. Yes — easier to sell to as well.

If we think about it, how technology actually impacts our behavior is very much an ethical issue. If the web is fundamentally built to scatter our focus and make us easy targets for market forces, then I would say that it is not built on genuine freedom. Instead, it's just an extension of the data- and attention-grabbing philosophy of the web we are experiencing today.

”Even decentralization is pointless if the web is designed to scatter us — because it doesn’t matter who owns it if we’re still losing ourselves.”

When we come in contact with easy-to-use apps or programs, we feel a sense of ease. But we need to go deeper to respect our limits and needs when we create our web.

Building a human-centric web means:

  • Building systems that refresh attention, not deplete it.
  • Designing tools that encourage reflection and intentional action — not just endless engagement.
  • Allowing people to choose when and how they participate, without being trapped in addiction loops.
  • Protecting the human mind as fiercely as we protect private keys.

I am sure you’ve felt it many times. It often feels like we’re trapped in a never-ending loop of fleeting digital trends — a viral dance on TikTok, a meme that everyone reposted, or a Twitter debate that dominated the conversation for a few days. These moments flare up, saturate our feeds, and then disappear. Great. But then they’re replaced by the next dopamine-triggering distraction. As this continues, we need to ask ourselves: what do we actually carry forward from them?

I took a look at the research, and I’m not surprised. Studies over the past five years show that this cycle of short-lived virality, fueled by algorithmic ranking and public validation metrics like “likes,” is taking a real toll on our mental health.

In short: constant exposure to high-stimulus, rapidly shifting content has been shown to fragment attention, elevate anxiety, and foster compulsive scrolling behaviors that leave users feeling more drained than connected.

What’s more, social media’s gamified feedback loops — likes, shares, views — deepen our dependence on external approval, reinforcing a culture of performance over presence.

”I like the idea of being able to turn off "like" counts or de-emphasize ranked feeds — especially on LinkedIn.”

LinkedIn is supposed to be about real professional connection. But the way it's built often pushes people to perform for attention instead of having real conversations. Something as simple as hiding like counts or letting people turn off the ranking of posts could make a big difference. It would help bring LinkedIn back to what it says it’s about — thoughtful sharing, real insights, and growth. People could post with more honesty and less pressure, without always comparing themselves to others.

In doing so, it disrupts the attention economy’s grip on our mental bandwidth and opens the door to a healthier kind of professional networking. That’s a step toward Web3 as it would give people more control and use it with more purpose.

I get that companies want our attention and our data. But if we don’t defend attention in the future of our web, even Web3 won't defend our freedom.

Categories
web3

The Web Should Feel Like Home — Not a Wild Safari


The Web Should Feel Like Home — Not a Wild Safari

If we’re serious about the Web that we are building, the roadmaps shouldn’t feel like sprint plans filled with technical upgrades. They should be blueprints for a society we’d be proud to call home. Picture me pointing to the horizon.

I’m sorry if I’ve been the one raising uncomfortable questions about the web we’re building. But I’m doing it because I want us to create a web that hugs and kisses us — a web that sees us as human beings first.

In the not-too-distant future, I see a town square where everyone who shows up has a voice — not just the tech-savvy, the loudest, or the wealthiest.
My neighbor Carina feels a real sense of belonging because she can participate meaningfully and actually participate in her digital community.
Honestly, I don’t imagine it happening inside a DAO, but rather on a social platform where she owns her own voice — her own data.
Yes, there’s still a corner for whitepaper discussions too, because technology must always serve human needs.

The smiling faces of people participating through beautifully simple design say it all.


A truly decentralized world doesn’t just open the door; it makes sure everyone can walk through it and stay and even address what’s wrong. Just because some parts may be immutable does not mean they should be unflexible to what is good for society. People evolve and so does society and technology needs to follow us, not the other way around.

As the sun settles over the village, I see people having interacted with the web for fun but also to save time for activities in reality.
After all, on our deathbed, having spent time with our closest friends and family is what we’ll have considered most important in life.

”I see a world where kids learn digital literacy like they learn to ride a bike — naturally, joyfully, safely. Not like releasing them into a wild safari.”

A world where the web works with our lives, not against them. Where technology in the hands of the youngest builds focus and curiosity, not addiction and exposure to casino-like platforms.

Above all, I see a web where young and old can create, collaborate, and unwind — without asking for permission or paying a heavy fee.

In other words, the web should feel like a natural extension of existence, not a hostile territory we have to tiptoe through.

I’m not being idealistic — it’s just common sense.
Web3 must be built, governed, and cared for with the best of our humanity. Not a place with hidden predators, stampeding herds, and unexpected twists around every corner.

Categories
web3

Why We Need Socrates in Our Web—and 3 Things His Friends Would Say


Why We Need Socrates in Our Web—and 3 Things His Friends Would Say

Web3 is many things: fast, creative, chaotic, sometimes profound, occasionally unhinged. It’s the future of our web. Its values of freedom and libertarianism are promising, but we need the annoying, relentless, sandals-wearing guy who refused to shut up until people asked better questions. Here’s what Socrates and his friends can do for our dear web.

I think Web3 needs to look backward, not just to the future. It’s optimizing systems that might not even be pointed at a world we’d want to live in. Sometimes it feels like a future without philosophy? A well-funded digital confusion.

In my work within health and wellness, I create courses within personal development and try to learn from the brightest minds of history. I know, Socrates wouldn’t audit the code of the web—he’d audit its intent. He’d show up in governance forums and ask if the definition of “community” includes anyone who can’t afford to buy in. He was all about being human-centric.

He’d be the one raising his hand to ask, “What do we mean by ‘freedom,’ exactly?” I feel that most people would find him annoying, but this is the kind of questioning we need to know where we are going, what we are building, and how we relate to the values of Web3.

Because if we don’t ask these questions, here’s what we risk building:
• a metaverse full of real estate speculation and zero community.
• a DAO that votes to evict tenants and calls it “alignment.”
• a social token protocol that turns human connection into yield.

Perhaps that future would be technically flawless. But it would also be ethically void. I’ve said it before: code cannot be law, because it would have forgotten how to listen.
Just because it’s decentralized doesn’t mean it’s good. No, not everything needs a token.

”We want the roadmap of Web3 projects to look like a philosophy of life that we actually want to live in.”

Kierkegaard said, “Life can only be understood backwards, but must be lived forwards.” Web3 lives very forward. It launches first, governs later, audits if we’re lucky. Remember, philosophy can be highly practical. In Web3, it can be a way to add hindsight before the crash.

Shannon put it more bluntly: “We may have knowledge of the past but cannot control it; we may control the future but have no knowledge of it.” So it’s obviously smart to build with both.

Every protocol needs a philosopher-in-charge. Nope, not a mascot. But a real existential auditor. Someone to ask: Who benefits? Who decides? Is this freedom, or just a new kind of control?

Just as we need our closest friends to raise their concerns when we do wrong or have lost our track in life, we need Socrates’ friends to ask necessary questions when we build our digital life:

“Just because it’s permissionless doesn’t mean it’s harmless.”

“Immutability is just stubbornness if you can’t admit when you’re wrong.”

“A protocol with no pause for reflection will automate a future no one meant to build.”

Yes, it’s about looking around before falling completely into the hands of hyper-fast innovation. Every societal development needs to occasionally consider re-orientation to remain aligned with its soul.

Categories
web3

Why Fairness is the Smartest Investment in Web3’s Future


Why Fairness is the Smartest Investment in Web3’s Future

If you didn’t know whether you’d be born into a wealthy family or one that struggles to pay for basic healthcare, wouldn’t you advocate for universal access to affordable services? It’s an easy question with a powerful answer: fairness makes sense when you don’t know where you’ll end up. Now, take this idea and apply it to the digital world. If you didn’t know whether you’d grow up with access to the latest technology or even reliable internet, how would you design the future of our digital lives? 

I would say it’s obvious. Systems designed for everyone are stronger, more widely adopted, and ultimately more successful. 

We’ve already seen what happens when fairness isn’t a priority. Look at social media platforms. They started with the promise of connection but ended up exploiting user data and prioritizing profits over people. Add the doom-scrolling and engagement trap, and I feel we are completely losing ourselves in the web. 

Here’s what we can do! When systems are designed with fairness in mind, they don’t just work—they thrive. 

Payday loan companies are a prime example of predatory lenders that exploit the poor. These companies target low-income individuals with promises of immediate cash, but their loans often come with annual percentage rates (APRs) exceeding 400%. Borrowers frequently fall into debt traps, as they are unable to pay back the loans on time, forcing them to roll over the debt and accrue even more fees. In contrast, blockchain-based microloan platforms offer a transparent and fair alternative, allowing borrowers to access small loans without the crushing interest rates and exploitative practices of traditional payday lenders. 

Remember, a loan doesn’t just help the farmer—it feeds their family and strengthens the community. That is only one example of how important fairness is in creating Web3. 

But fairness doesn’t happen by accident. It requires deliberate design. We could use philosopher John Rawls’ practical framework for this: the veil of ignorance. 

Although it’s a broad philosophy, it should be used for Web3. It’s about designing Web3 without knowing your position in it. Easy, right? You wouldn’t know if you’d be an early adopter with resources and expertise or someone in a rural area with limited access to technology. From this perspective, fairness becomes essential because nobody wants to build a system they might be excluded from. Brilliant! 

If we followed this approach, Web3 would look very different: 

Accessibility would be a priority. We obviously need to build a web for everyday people, not for engineers. But I guess we have to start somewhere… 

Governance would also be fair. Today, many Web3 platforms tie voting power to how many tokens you own. This means the richest participants get the loudest voice. A fairer system considers how smaller stakeholders can have a more proportional say and therefore ensures that decisions reflect the needs of everyone, not just the wealthy few. 

And rewards would be equitable. Early adopters often get outsized benefits, leaving latecomers with little to gain. A fairer Web3 would reward meaningful participation, not just polarizing speach and speculation. Just like the internet has enough porn, degens have had too much control creating tokens and marketplaces for speculation… 

I know fairness sounds idealistic, therefore let’s look at a real-world example of why it works in the real world.

In Kenya, the mobile money platform M-Pesa is not a web3 project but it has changed lives by providing financial services to millions who were excluded from traditional banking. I would say it’s a classic example of how designing for accessibility and inclusion doesn’t just solve problems—it creates opportunities.

”If fairness even works for a financial project built on the centralized traditional system, it certainly works for web3.”

… but only if we take fairness seriously. 

So, just as the title of my book says, we need to ask ourselves, What kind of world are we building? I would like to end by reminding us that behind every wallet, every transaction, and every decentralized vote is a human story. And those stories deserve systems that serve them—not the other way around.  

Categories
web3

Web3 — A Human Revolution If We Do It Right


Web3 — A Human Revolution If We Do It Right

A wallet is not a person, it’s a life. A unique individual navigating challenges, triumphs, and dreams. But, in a web3 space often dominated by anonymity and numbers, we risk dehumanizing ourselves.  

When you see a wallet address—a string of alphanumeric characters—it’s easy to focus on what it represents: assets, transactions, or activity on the blockchain. But that address belongs to someone.  

Take, for example, a young woman in Afghanistan who recently learned to code through a Web3 initiative that I wrote about last week. Her wallet isn’t just a tool for storing cryptocurrency—it’s a lifeline. It’s where she receives her earnings for freelance projects, where she saves for her family’s future, and where she holds the key to a sense of independence she never thought possible. To her, that wallet represents freedom in a world where opportunities for women are scarce.  

Without knowing her story, her wallet address could be dismissed as just another string of characters in the blockchain. But her reality is far more profound. Perhaps she’s called mommy and she pays for her mother’s medications, her siblings’ education, and food for her family. 

One of the greatest promises of Web3 is its ability to empower people through anonymity and decentralization. In reality these are not empty buzz-words. 

Web3 wallets allow individuals to participate in the global economy without disclosing their identity or relying on traditional institutions. This is especially critical for people who live in places where financial systems are inaccessible or discriminatory.  

But anonymity can also create distance between us. When we see people as wallet addresses instead of human beings, we risk detaching from the social and ethical responsibilities that come with this new technology. 

I feel, it’s easier to dismiss a wallet as “just another address” than to acknowledge the person behind it and the challenges or triumphs they represent. Am I right?

But, this detachment can have consequences. When we lose sight of the human story behind blockchain transactions, we risk building systems that prioritize efficiency over equity, or innovation over inclusion.   

If Web3 is to fulfill its promise of decentralization, empowerment,  and freedom, we must actively remember the human stories behind the technology. This perspective is vital for our well-being because it ensures that the systems we build serve people—not the other way around.  

I don’t have to turn to research to claim that when people feel seen and respected, they are more likely to thrive—mentally, emotionally, and physically. 

In the context of Web3, respecting the human stories behind wallets can mean the difference between fostering trust and creating alienation.  

If platforms fail to recognize the person behind a wallet address, they might implement policies or systems that unintentionally exclude them or make it harder for them to participate. But when platforms adopt a human-centric perspective, they make sure that people are supported, included, and given the tools they need to succeed.   

”This is respect for us as human beings and how we create stronger communities”

I dare to say. To me it’s simple, by keeping people at the center, we ensure that Web3 delivers on its promise to empower individuals and solve real-world problems.  

Web3 can be a human revolution if we listen to ourselves and do it right.

Categories
web3

How Web3 Is Actually Empowering Women and Changing Lives

How Web3 Is Actually Empowering Women and Changing Lives

In many parts of the world, women face unimaginable hardships. From systemic inequality to cultural restrictions, their opportunities are often dictated by forces beyond their control. After having spent over 20 years in public health I have learnt that when women thrive, their families thrive, and society as a whole benefits. Therefore it’s particularly interesting to hear about how Web3 technology can help women in the face of adversity.

Blockchain technology, is emerging as a powerful tool to amplify women’s resilience. By providing women with access to education, financial independence, and global opportunities, Web3 is not only transforming individual lives but also creating a profound public health impact. Nowhere is this more evident than in Afghanistan, where women are using Web3 to rewrite their futures.

Across the globe, women face systemic barriers that limit their access to education, employment, and financial independence. In many countries, cultural norms and restrictive policies further exacerbate these challenges. Let me paint a clear picture:

  • According to UNESCO, 129 million girls worldwide are out of school, with many denied access due to poverty, conflict, or gender discrimination.
  • The World Bank reports that nearly 1 billion women globally remain unbanked, unable to access basic financial services.

Let’s remember, that women’s lack of autonomy often leads to poorer health outcomes for themselves and their families, perpetuating cycles of poverty and inequality.

Afghanistan is a stark example of these challenges. Since the Taliban regained control in 2021, women’s rights have been severely restricted. Girls are banned from secondary education, women are excluded from most jobs, and their ability to participate in public life has been drastically curtailed. For Afghan women, the dream of independence and opportunity seems almost impossible. But here’s where I found this promising project.

Code to Inspire, the first coding school for girls in Afghanistan, are teaching women how to code and earn cryptocurrency. Founded by Fereshteh Forough, Code to Inspire equips women with technical skills and access to decentralized financial systems, enabling them to bypass traditional barriers.

"Before learning to code, some of the women felt invisible. had no way to support themselves or their family. But now, they’re earning cryptocurrency for work, and it’s given them a sense of freedom."

I think ”code to inspire” challenges not only traditional gender roles but also brings real world value to the individual and society. Truly necessary.

Through Web3, these women are not only gaining financial independence but also reclaiming their agency. Cryptocurrency allows them to securely earn, save, and spend money without relying on local banking systems, which are often inaccessible or controlled by restrictive policies. This financial autonomy is a game-changer, especially in a country where women’s economic participation is heavily restricted.

When I worked for the World Health Organization I saw the impact of focusing on women for to improve society. In fact, research consistently shows that when women gain financial independence, the benefits ripple out to their families and communities. Women are more likely than men to reinvest their earnings in education, healthcare, and nutrition, creating a multiplier effect that improves the well-being of entire households. Women are caring and smart.

In Afghanistan, where maternal and child health outcomes are among the worst in the world, this ripple effect is particularly significant. By empowering women to earn and control their own income, Web3 is indirectly improving public health. To be clear,

  • women with financial independence can afford healthier food for their families, reducing malnutrition rates.
  • With their own income, women can pay for medical care, vaccinations, and medicines for their children.
  • Financially empowered women are more likely to invest in their children’s education, breaking the cycle of poverty and inequality.

This connection between women’s empowerment and public health underscores the broader societal impact of Web3.

The story of Afghan women using Web3 is a powerful example of resilience and innovation in the face of extreme adversity. But it’s not just about Afghanistan. Around the world, women are using Web3 to overcome systemic barriers and create new opportunities for themselves and their families. From creators in the United Kingdom using NFTs to earn a living, to rural entrepreneurs in India accessing microloans through DeFi platforms, the potential of Web3 to drive positive change is exciting.

Here I could use buzz-words like the revolution of blockchain technology and it’s premise of freedom and empowerment. But this time it’s about actual utility for people in reality.

I think the story of Afghan women using Web3 challenges us to think about how we can use technology to empower others, create opportunities, and build a more equitable world. When we invest in women, we invest in families, communities, and the future of society. A human-centric web.