Category: web3

Categories
web3

Web3 Is Here—but Are You Ready to Lose More of Your Time?

Web3 Is Here—but Are You Ready to Lose More of Your Time?

Web3 was supposed to set us free. More autonomy. More ownership. More control. But after a weekend on a tiny island in Sweden, I’m starting to wonder: is it actually making life easier—or just pushing us deeper into a digital existence?

I don’t know if we were ever aiming for a technology that serves humanity, because look around. Instead of giving us more time to be human, it feels like we’re being asked to put more and more of our lives on-chain, in permanent, trackable, financialized ways.

I don’t think everything should be online.

I don’t want my reputation, relationships, or real-life actions to be turned into tokens, scores, or assets. But that’s exactly where things seem to be heading.

Hear my frustration. Technology is supposed to free us, not capture us.

I mean, the washing machine freed up hours of manual labor. And the car gave us the ability to explore and connect. Oh yes, the telephone let us communicate instantly without travel. These technologies saved time and made human life easier.

Now look at digital technology:

  • Social media gave us connection—but also addiction.
  • The smartphone gave us convenience—but took away presence.
  • Web3 promised us decentralization—but sometimes feels like it's just making everything a marketplace.

Yes I am bullish, cryptocurrencies are effective in cross-border transactions and save time, and smart contracts can be tremendously helpful in providing effective solutions when certain conditions are aligned. All that big-tech stuff is useful for our financial system and can benefit companies and society. But…

I mean, where is the part where technology gives us back time instead of just finding new ways to extract our attention, our data, and now—our very identities?

After a weekend offline, it’s refreshingly clear—our humanness exists beyond the blockchain. Most of life doesn’t need to be on-chain. In fact, almost nothing does!

  • Do we need every purchase, every interaction, every choice to be permanently recorded?
  • Do we need to turn every action into a financial transaction?
  • Do we need to tie our identity to an unchangeable ledger?

Question: When I tokenize my soul (on Cardano), can I sell it to the devil for a quick buck? Or do I need to use the SOL network for that?

I get why trustless, transparent systems matter for big things—finance, governance, global coordination. But my everyday life, or soul, should not be tracked with the same permanence.

Web3 has the potential to give us freedom, but only if we use it in ways that actually make life easier—not just more digital. Dear Web3 God, I’ve got one request: Can I get my daughter back from the digital abyss that snatched her?

Categories
web3

We Don’t Need a Smarter Internet– We Need a Kinder One

We Don’t Need a Smarter Internet–We Need a Kinder One

The web algorithm has figured out that fear keeps us engaged longer than nuance ever will. This is a problem because fear brings chaos, misinformation, and crap to our beloved web. It’s not a coincidence. A study by MIT found that false news spreads six times faster than real news. Why? Because misinformation is designed to trigger reactions, and reactions mean engagement. And in Web2, engagement equals profit.

Yes—Web3 was supposed to fix this with decentralization, ownership, and freedom!
But I have a fear that instead of doomscrolling, we are building tokenized engagement loops. Instead of being trapped by algorithms, we’ll be trapped by financial incentives. And suddenly, "digital ownership" might just mean we own a piece of our own exploitation. It’s like paid doomscrolling. That’s not the experience I want in the human web we are creating.

Do not get me wrong. Web3 has tremendous potential; that is why we need to consider where we are heading.
I have previously touched upon the fact that we have already turned our lives into content. We monetized our hobbies. We branded our personalities. I agree with a friendly follower on LinkedIn who said, “Back in the day, the internet felt genuine.”

Great news, some Web3 projects are asking the right questions:
Twimbit is trying to make research more accessible instead of just viral. WeAre8 wants to reshape social media so that engagement isn’t just about outrage and dopamine hits.The Prosocial Media Movement is working on ways to build online spaces that reward thoughtful interaction over emotional knee-jerk responses.

I am not saying that these projects are the panacea for Web2’s disease. But at least they’re recognizing the problem.
The issue isn’t that the internet is getting (AI) smart. It’s that it’s getting better at manipulating us. AI-driven algorithms, engagement-based incentives, and financialization are all shaping how we think, feel, and interact…and slowly killing many professions.

I do not have the answers to all the questions. But we need to consider if we are building an internet that empowers us, or one that turns us into highly efficient, DEEPLY predictable consumers? Is it too much to ask for Web3 that is kind to our needs and considers our well-being as well?

Let’s soften the sharp greedy corners of the old Web2 structure with human-centric ideas and values. Let’s make the web kind again…

Categories
web3

The Death of Free Will: How Web3’s Incentives Are Reprogramming Us

The Death of Free Will: How Web3’s Incentives Are Reprogramming Us

Back in the day, we scrolled through the internet aimlessly, clicking on things because we were curious. We liked posts because we actually liked them. We read articles because we wanted to, not because they were engineered to keep us hooked. Then, a few greedy tech companies realized that our behavior is programmable.

It seemed innocent at first. A notification here. A dopamine hit there. Then social media turned into an engagement battlefield, and suddenly, Web2 became a giant experiment in algorithmic persuasion. You and I were turned into data points to engineer our behavior. You know—the trillion-dollar social media game…

Is Web3 making things better, or is it just turning every action into a transaction? Think about what happens to us in this system:

  • Want to post something? Earn a token.
  • Want to like something? Get rewarded.
  • Want to participate in a community? Stake some crypto first.

At first, I believed it was great to be rewarded for my time in the Web3 system. But I think we need to question: Are we still making choices, or are we just responding to financial stimuli?

Let’s remember why tech companies love gamification—it’s to shape our behavior. We like to believe we’re in control of our actions, but when everything is turned into a game, it taps into something deep in our brains.

It’s frankly frightening. Just look at how we keep checking our phones for that reward. “Maybe this time I’ll get likes, engagement, or even tokens!”

Then there’s FOMO. “Everyone is in the game, and I don’t want to be left out.”

And our cognitive biases? Even worse. Take the sunk cost fallacy—a dangerous mental trap that keeps us chasing likes, followers, or tokens simply because we’ve already invested time and effort, even when it’s unhealthy. It controls our behavior by making us value past effort over our well-being.

We see this same phenomenon in investing in cryptocurrencies or collecting engagement. You already bought in, so you keep playing—even when it stops being smart.

On a societal level, what happens in a fully tokenized economy, where every social interaction has a financial consequence (tied to our crypto wallets)? At what point are we still living real lives, and at what point are we just responding to financial carrots being dangled in front of us?

Look, incentives aren’t inherently bad. They drive innovation. They motivate us. Cool. But at some point, we have to ask: Are we designing systems that serve people, or just ones that extract maximum engagement and financial commitment?

Because we want to create a world where we actually want to be—not one where we feel like we have to be.

The Human Web should be the cure to Web2’s manipulation—not just an upgraded, financialized version of it.

But hey, what do I know? I’m just a like junkie like the rest of us. Please hit the like button.

Categories
web3

Web3 Is Not the Future—Until It Feels Like Home

Web3 Is Not the Future—Until It Feels Like Home

I hear that Web3 is the future. Decentralization! Ownership! Freedom! But here’s the thing: the future doesn’t happen just because it should. It happens when people actually want it. And right now, this place we are building does not feel like home.

Think about it. Why did people flock to Web1? Because the internet gave them access to information like never before. Why did Web2 take over the world? Because it made connecting with people effortless. Humans adopt technology when it fits into their lives, not when it requires them to read a 12-step guide just to log in.

I think Web3 feels like a gated community that’s difficult to enter. Wallets, seed phrases, gas fees—it’s like moving into a house where you have to build the door yourself and remember 24 words, or you lose the keys forever. That feels like a nerdy escape room, not a home to live in.

I seem to be one of those nerdy residents, but for Web3 to truly become the next era of the internet, it needs to do what every successful technological shift has done. We need to feel familiar with the home we are creating, and Web3 platforms should obviously be as easy to use as Web2. Pretty please, education in blockchain technology is hardly the way to mass adoption. How many people have completed a course in Word or Office 365 before using it?

One more thing. Nobody cares what version of the web they’re using. I have never heard, “I love Web2!” People just use it.

This is one of the reasons why I renamed the Cryptobeyer newsletter to The Human Web—because the '3' in Web3 needs to work in the background. It is not the headline.

Most of all, Web3 needs to solve human problems. Our problems. Not just create a new massive market for financial speculation or the ability to “own” a profile picture.

Good news. Real-life use cases seem to be a growing market in cryptocurrencies. This is a sign that solving problems matters, even for profit.

So we are on our way, but I wonder—when will it feel like home for not only nerds? What do you think is needed?

Categories
web3

Web3: The Marketplace of Human Experience

Web3: The Marketplace of Human Experience

The future we’re heading toward isn’t problem-free—it just accelerates us into new ones. We used to live in a world where some things just existed. A home was a place to live. A hobby was something you did for fun. A friendship was a connection, not a commodity. But somewhere along the way, that changed.

Airbnb turned homes into investments, and Instagram turned our lives into personal brands. Sorry, but LinkedIn turned networking into content marketing.

Now, we want Web3 to push this development even further.

In Web3, our attention is an asset. It’s scary, but mine and your reputation is an asset, and so are our relationships. Sure, our humanness has always been our most valuable asset in living, but now we are making this increasingly tradable.

Last week, I touched upon the issue that our soul seems to be getting tradable. Nothing just is anymore. Now, even our attention has a price.

Web3 was supposed to be different. It promised to break free from the systems of Web2, where tech giants profited from our data and behavior. But instead of dismantling the machine, we seem to just be rebuilding it—only this time, it’s decentralized. Now, instead of companies monetizing us, we’re doing it to ourselves.

I am not saying that monetization is inherently bad. Ownership, transparency, and financial autonomy are all much-needed shifts. The problem is when everything becomes an asset, when every interaction carries an economic weight. When engaging in a community isn’t about belonging but about speculation. When our online presence isn’t just an extension of who we are but a portfolio to be optimized.

As an author, I live and breathe the stressful and frankly demotivating effect of living in a world where art (writing) is supposed to be optimized for sales. In an era where everything is commodified, art for art’s sake isn’t a luxury—it’s essential to preserving our humanity. This shift extends beyond writing—musicians sell royalties as NFTs, DAOs monetize collaborative work, and even digital artists face pressure to tokenize their creativity. Web3 could empower creators, but will it free them or simply make them optimize even more?

When technology is designed primarily to serve capitalist structures, efficiency and profit take priority over our well-being. Algorithms push us to work more, hustle harder, and engage in an endless cycle of self-optimization. Rest becomes laziness. Hobbies become side hustles. Even social interactions are filtered through a lens of networking and opportunity.

We are running toward a world where value is no longer just about meaning, connection, or fulfillment—but about liquidity. About what can be bought, sold, staked, or flipped.

This isn’t just a Web3 problem—it’s a cultural one. If Web3 is truly to be a break from the past, it can’t just decentralize who profits—it must redefine what sound progress means. Perhaps there’s a way Web3 can shift the focus from pure monetization to sustainability, creativity, and genuine human connection.

I am sure we want to use technology to create a world beyond just decentralized hyper-financialization.

I don’t have to say that we all like profit. The question is: Are we doing our best to create tools for empowerment? Or just new ways to turn life itself into a marketplace?

Categories
web3

Tokenized Everything: Are We Selling Our Souls to Web3?

Tokenized Everything: Are We Selling Our Souls to Web3?

Web3 was supposed to set us free. You know the gist! Decentralization, financial empowerment, ownership. All big words, big promises. The idea was simple: take back control from banks, tech giants, and middlemen who profit from our data and hard-earned money. But are we missing what is slowly happening? Web3 seems to be turning every aspect of our lives into an asset to be bought, sold, or speculated on. We need to be aware of the world we are creating.

It started with real estate. Platforms like Lofty allow anyone to buy fractions of rental properties, turning homeownership into a tradable token. Then Gucci and Louis Vuitton launched digital fashion NFTs that blur the line between collectible and commodity. At first, I thought this seemed relatively harmless. If anything, it was just an extension of what already existed in traditional markets.

But then, people started selling access to themselves. Influencers tokenized their time, offering personal video calls and direct messages in exchange for crypto and fiat. Some projects introduced “social tokens,” where buying a share of someone’s token gives you privileges, like an investment, but in a person instead of a company. Even engagement on social media has become monetized, with users rewarded in tokens simply for paying attention. Money, money, money…

At some point, we must ask: what’s left? If everything is tokenized, does anything have value beyond its price tag?

The idea that Web3 would create a new digital economy was always part of the plan. I hear asset tokenization is expected to reach $5 trillion by 2030. Traditional institutions are already exploring ways to integrate blockchain into finance, real estate, and healthcare. But as we rush to turn everything into a marketplace, it’s worth asking what kind of world we’re building. Are we creating a future of empowerment, or simply hyper-capitalism where every interaction has a price? To be frank, even likes on social media have turned into a transaction of value. If I like you, you like me.

Web3 promised us ownership, but it never quite defined what we should own. Really think about it. If we’re not careful, we might wake up in a world where everything is for sale—including the things that were never meant to be for sale. Don’t get me wrong. I am fascinated by Web3 technology and what it can bring to society. I’m even bullish on it.

But what is priceless in our world? I would say that our trust, our lives, and our souls should be priceless. How can we trust it’s genuine and not just profit-driven when we start tokenizing our (digital) lives, including our identity, values, and humanness? Put differently, would you trust me if every aspect of me was always on sale?

I do not have all the answers, but these questions need to be raised as we embrace Web3 technology. So, what do you think? Are we tokenizing a bright future or just putting a price tag on things that were once priceless?

Categories
web3

Rebuilding Trust in a Distrustful World

Rebuilding Trust in a Distrustful World

Before the 18th century and the industrial revolution, trust was simple. A handshake, a promise, or even just a word was enough to seal agreements and build relationships. Communities prospered on mutual understanding, shared values, and unwritten social contracts. Nowadays, we rely on documentation and intermediaries to feel certainty in how we operate our society. What happened to us, and what led us to realize that the old ways weren’t working?

The short story is that the industrial revolutions created a more complex world, which required a new approach to trust.

When I think back to history, trust wasn’t always something we had to write down or verify through third parties. In smaller communities, accountability came naturally because everyone knew each other. If someone broke their word, the consequences were immediate and visible. However, as societies scaled and globalized, personal connections faded, and institutions—governments, banks, and corporations—stepped in to fill the space. The world turned digital, and technology companies stepped in to store our data and govern interactions, shaping public discourse.

Then we had the 2008 financial crash, and we suddenly realized how shady and self-serving some financial systems could be. Scandals like Cambridge Analytica exposed the extent to which big tech companies increasingly exploited our personal information for profit. We understood that governments and corporations (e.g., Meta) often wield control in ways that benefit themselves rather than the people they claim to serve. Our blind willingness to rely on centralized authorities also eroded over time. Slowly but surely, people began to lose faith—not just in institutions, but in the idea that anyone else had their best interests at heart.

Now, what did we do when we had created a world too big and complex for us, with declining trust levels? We turned to technology to solve our problems for us. As always.

We created what we call Web3 technologies, aiming to increase transparency in this complex society. I’m sure you’ve heard of blockchain technology, which creates unchallengeable records of every transaction or decision. These technologies restore clarity and confidence in systems that once felt impenetrable and difficult to improve. Great, but…

It’s sad that, in some way, we’re creating a society that doesn’t require trust between people to function well. When do we cross the line into a trustless society that erodes the very core fabric of human relations? Moreover, we can’t put blind trust in AI which is part of Web3?

An even bigger question is whether the failure of past eras was rooted in a lack of trust between people—or was it the result of structures designed to favor certain groups while excluding others? I think both. When trust breaks down, we turn to rules, regulations, and intermediaries to get cooperation. The problem is that those very mechanisms can sometimes maintain current inequality in the system if we're not aware of the weakening of human-centric values in our digital age.

Maybe I romanticize the past, imagining a world where trust flowed beautifully between neighbors and strangers alike. I have to consider that societal evolution brought challenges that couldn’t be solved by good old trust. It’s also clear that as our existence grew intercontinental and economies globalized, face-to-face relationships changed. All in all, our complex societal structures forced us to create abstract systems governed by laws, policies, and now code. However, I sincerely hope that trust between people will prevail—you and me.

The beauty of Web3 lies in its potential. It invites us to imagine a society where transparency, decentralization, and inclusivity guide us.

Yet I wonder: Will Web3 succeed? Only if we approach it thoughtfully, ensuring it doesn’t repeat the mistakes of previous eras. Transparency, decentralization, and equity are key ingredients for rebuilding trust. But without genuine human connections, these alone won’t be enough.

Without meaningful human connections, we risk creating a trustless technocratic society where code replaces accountability. That’s not progress; it’s regression.

Maybe I should ask: How can we ensure that Web3 doesn’t just replace broken systems but also restores trust between people? Let’s work together to create a future where technology enhances trust, rather than replacing it. After all, we’re still not humanoids.

Categories
web3

Sweden’s Innovation Legacy: Setting the Stage for Web3

Sweden's Innovation Legacy: Setting the Stage for Web3

As a Swede, I hear about our strong history of creating powerful solutions, like Spotify, Bluetooth, and the pacemaker, which have changed everyday life for people around the world. This same spirit of innovation can now be used to make things like money management, voting, and even how we share information online more fair, safe, and easy for everyone through new digital ideas. Yet, when it comes to Web3, I can’t help but feel we’re sitting on untapped potential. Here’s what Sweden could do.

For inspiration, I looked at what Sweden could learn from Singapore.

Sweden has distinct advantages that, if properly utilized, could position us as leaders in Web3. These strengths lie in our love for equality, transparency, and social welfare. Yes, these values align perfectly with the principles of decentralization and trust that underpin Web3 technologies.

Sweden could use blockchain to enhance transparency in public services or create decentralized systems that empower underserved communities. These aren’t far-fetched ideas; they’re practical applications of Web3 that could improve how we live and work. But first, we need to recognize these opportunities.

One of Sweden’s greatest strengths is its dedication to transparency. I would say this is a big selling point for Web3 for Scandinavian hearts since we know that transparency increases trust. Whether it’s open government data or accessible public records, we truly value clarity and accountability. Web3 offers a chance to take this even further.

I would also like to highlight the possibilities of a blockchain-based system for tracking medical records, making healthcare more efficient and equitable. Let me tell you, the healthcare sector needs it badly.

In Singapore, blockchain is being used to enhance supply chain transparency, ensuring consumers know exactly where their products come from. They’ve also piloted blockchain solutions for cross-border trade, reducing fraud and increasing efficiency. If Singapore can do it for trade, why can’t Sweden do it for public services?

Sweden’s robust social welfare system—with universal healthcare, social benefits, and social support—is one of our proudest achievements. However, it is also characterized by a complex and extensive bureaucratic framework. Now, picture enhancing it with Web3 solutions that make services faster, cheaper, and more inclusive.

For instance, blockchain could simplify the process of verifying eligibility for pensions, unemployment support, or housing assistance. This would reduce bureaucracy while ensuring no one falls through the cracks.

Singapore has implemented blockchain-based identity verification systems to improve access to government services. These systems allow citizens to securely share personal information only when necessary, protecting privacy while speeding up processes. I wonder if Sweden could adopt similar solutions to make social welfare more efficient?

"If Sweden uses Web3 technology to strengthen our social safety net even further, we’ll set an example for the rest of the world."

Sweden has a long-standing love for gender equality and inclusion. I suggest, develop targeted programs that encourage women and underrepresented groups to engage with Web3 technologies. Offer workshops, scholarships, and mentorship initiatives to create a more diverse and inclusive community. Well, I guess it’s early…

However, Singapore actively supports diversity in tech through partnerships with universities and industry leaders. Programs like TechSkills Accelerator (TeSA) provide training in blockchain and other emerging technologies, ensuring that everyone has access to new opportunities.

Swedish authorities could look further into providing secure digital identities, protecting citizens’ privacy online with Web3 technology. Take a sneak peek at Singapore’s government, which has invested heavily in blockchain infrastructure to foster trust in both public and private sectors.

Who cares? Well, in our digital world, trust is more important than ever.

When I think about Sweden’s potential in Web3, I see potential that we would create a future where technology works for everyone, not just the few. Blockchain technology can ensure fair elections, make healthcare more accessible, and empower small businesses to compete globally. These aren’t distant dreams—they’re already being pursued by other nations and are within reach if Sweden chooses to pursue them.

So, we can build on what we already do best: promoting equality, fostering trust, and solving real-world problems. By applying these values to Web3, we’ll create solutions that most Swedes think would improve society even more.

I wonder, will we seize this opportunity?

Categories
web3

Web3’s Missing Soul: Why Reality Isn’t Found in Code

Web3's Missing Soul: Why Reality Isn’t Found in CodeYour Heading

Here’s my truth: Reality isn’t found in code. It’s found in connection. Not the kind of connection you make by hitting "like" on a post or buying an NFT, but the kind that happens when you look someone in the eye, shake their hand, or share a laugh together. If Web3 really wants to improve our lives—and not just impress us with its promises—it needs to remember this simple fact. And right now, I see a problem.

Web3 is all about the digital world. That might seem obvious, but stay with me. The fact that it lives almost entirely online is holding it back. Why? Because we’re human beings first and I’m not convinced that we are naturally digital creatures.

We need touch, smell, taste, and real-life experiences. We long for things that can’t be captured by screens or blockchain transactions. Sure, Web3 has the potential to change industries, help creators, and level the playing field—but if it stays stuck in cyberspace, it risks being nothing more than a shiny illusion, a pretend revolution that never touches the ground.

Have you ever felt that strange feeling while scrolling through your phone or chatting about someting? You know, that little voice whispering that something’s missing? That’s exactly where Web3 needs to meet us—in the real world. Being a somewhat spiritual person myself I would say it’s our soul calling for something.

However, I would say that the physical is slowly gaining ground in the Web3 space. Sure, speculation is a considerable part with thousands of useless tokens created on Pump.fun. But I genuinely feel a shift is happening, a move away from speculation and toward utility. This trend suggests that Web3 technologies are starting to focus on solving real-world problems and touching us on a human premise.

Tokenization of real-world assets is doing just that, opening new possibilities for investment and ownership. By turning tangible items like art, real estate, and even agricultural produce into digital tokens, Web3 is unlocking trillions in new markets. This isn’t just about making money; it’s about democratizing access to wealth-building opportunities that were once reserved for the elite.

Meanwhile, decentralized finance (DeFi) is evolving beyond speculative trading. It’s entering what experts call the "dividend era," where protocols distribute revenue directly to users and token holders. This is great news because, instead of chasing quick gains, DeFi is building sustainable financial systems that benefit everyone.

The classic Web3 wet dream where small businesses in remote villages can access loans instantly, without needing traditional banks—or where individuals can earn interest on their savings without relying on centralized institutions. This is slowly becoming reality.

Stablecoins, too, are great examples. They’re now transforming how businesses and consumers conduct transactions. Their stability makes them ideal for everything from cross-border payments to everyday shopping. I heard the transaction volume of stablecoin transactions are higher than that of Visa and Mastercard. Even though the legacy system processes more small-value transactions, stablecoins are clearly gaining traction.

When doing research, I was reminded of the clearest sign of all. Major companies are embracing blockchain technology to improve operations. From tracking supply chains to managing healthcare records, these systems are reaching our physical reality. Medical records are securely stored on a blockchain, accessible only to authorized parties, ensuring privacy and accuracy. Or consider tracking the origin of pharmaceuticals to combat counterfeit drugs.

I was stunned the other day. Apparently, some hardcore Bitcoiners are realizing that Bitcoin hasn't lived up to its utility promises.

Moreover, the fact is that businesses and institutions and consumers now demand real utility.

My gaze drifts to the window, where the world outside moves freely. I better call my daughter for a walk.

I wonder “What does this mean for Web3?”

These examples show that Web3 doesn’t have to exist solely in the abstract world of code. When it steps into the physical realm, it becomes more relatable to us, more impactful, and more meaningful. Like a walk in the park. "Hi Siri! Call Tara.“

Categories
web3

How I Went from Laughing at Crypto to Having Existential Web3 Thoughts

How I Went from Laughing at Crypto to Having Existential Web3 Thoughts

Five years ago, if you had told me I’d be writing about Web3, I would have smiled and said, “Of course,” because I’m too curious for my own good. Crypto? Blockchain? NFTs? It all sounded like a scam.

And yet—here we are. Once again, ahead of my time, I’m actively trying to convince Swedes—a people who trust banks more than their own mothers—that this actually matters. Somewhere along the way, my skepticism turned into curiosity, my curiosity turned into obsession, and my obsession led me to actually start writing about this stuff.

The moment it all started to go wrong

Like many, my introduction to crypto came through a friend who lost a ton of money trading Bitcoin. “I mean, why just hodl when you can beat the market?” The Swedish media had already confirmed what I suspected—crypto was either a Ponzi scheme, a money-laundering tool, or just a really good way to lose money. And as a rational, law-abiding Swede, I knew better.

Then, one evening, sitting there with my daily bowl of porridge, I made the mistake of watching some YouTube videos. First, it was harmless curiosity. But soon, I had spent hundreds of hours watching Raoul Pal, Charles Hoskinson, Paul Barron, Brad Garlinghouse, and Michael Saylor rant about decentralization and financial freedom. Sweet Buddha, I even found myself lying in bed watching BitBoy Crypto and cursing every time Gary Gensler made the news. My friends were getting worried.

And then it hit me.

"Wait a second… what if they’re right?"

They weren’t just gambling on dog coins. They were talking about a new internet, a financial system that doesn’t require permission, and the possibility that trusting massive institutions with everything we own might not be the best idea ever.

My existential crisis

At first, I tried to shake it off. After all, Sweden had a perfectly regulated financial system! Who needs crypto when we have Swish and our government-approved banking overlords?

But Web3, I realized, wasn’t just about money. It was about power, ownership, and control. It was about the fact that most of us willingly hand over all our data, assets, and digital identities to a handful of companies who monetize every click we make.

Meanwhile, Sweden’s Web3 discourse is… well, let’s just say it needs some work. The conversation still sounds like this:

"Crypto is a scam."
"But blockchain could revolutionize finance!"
"Okay, but Bitcoin is bad for the environment."
"Yes, but Ethereum moved to proof-of-stake"
"I don’t trust it. My bank works just fine."

Meanwhile, the U.S., Europe, and Asia are already integrating blockchain into finance, healthcare, and governance, while Sweden still acts like Web3 is some rebellious teenager who just needs to grow up and get a corporate job.

So, why am I still here?

Well, my mom says I’m special. So, obviously, I had to step in.

Honestly, it wasn’t one single “aha” moment. It was one major realization:

If people like me—who care about social development and human well-being—don’t engage with Web3, then the space will be shaped by those who only care about profit.

So now, I’m here, running Cryptobeyer, asking the questions Sweden isn’t—hoping that one day, someone will actually answer. ”Hello does anyone hear me?”